Which of the following best indicates a highly specific and plausible plan for self-harm or violence?

• A. A vague expression of threats with no specifics
• B. A highly specific, comprehensive and plausible plan for self-harm or violence
• C. An impulsive statement with no plan
• D. An indirect statement about needing help

Answer: (B)

The most concerning indicator is when someone outlines a highly specific, comprehensive, and plausible plan for self-harm or violence. When details are clear—exact method, timing, location, and how they would obtain what they need—it shows they’ve thought through the steps and may have taken practical steps toward acting on the plan. That combination of intent and perceived ability makes the risk much higher and requires urgent attention and safety planning.

Vague threats or statements without specifics tend to reflect general distress or agitation rather than a concrete plan, so the immediacy of risk is lower. An impulsive remark with no plan suggests a reaction in the moment rather than a premeditated course of action. Indirectly asking for help signals distress but not an explicit intent to harm, though it still calls for support and monitoring.